Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia: A Practical Comparison of Child-Led Learning Approaches for Families and Educators

It’s been a while since I last wrote for the Knowledge Exchange Network, and a lot has changed in my world. Since then, I welcomed my second daughter in July, moved to a new home, and—perhaps most relevant to this community—I’m now in the thick of vetting preschool options for my almost-three-year-old.

Like many caregivers and educators navigating early childhood, I’m finding myself revisiting the big question: What do we believe young children need most from their learning environments?

As I compare different schools, I’m repeatedly drawn to three well-known models—Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia. These approaches are often grouped together under the umbrella of “alternative education,” yet they’re grounded in very different ways of understanding children, learning, and development. They also stand in contrast to the “traditional” models most of us grew up with: adult-directed instruction, predictable curricula, and a focus on early academics.

As I sort through these approaches for myself in considering options for my child, I thought it might be helpful to share my observations with others. Below, I walk through the essentials of each model, highlight what sets them apart from traditional schooling, and explore their key similarities and differences. My hope is that this helps both families making decisions and educators reflecting on their own practice.

What Makes These Approaches Different From “Traditional” Schooling?

Before diving into each philosophy, it’s worth naming what they all share in contrast to conventional models:

• Child-led learning rather than teacher-delivered instruction

• Hands-on, open-ended experiences instead of worksheets or rote tasks

• Mixed-age or flexible grouping rather than strict age-based cohorting

• A focus on the whole child: social-emotional, sensory, creative, and physical development

• Prepared learning environments that invite exploration, collaboration, and independence

  
  

Traditional early childhood programs, especially those influenced by K–12 academic pressures, often emphasize early literacy and numeracy benchmarks, structured learning blocks, and teacher control over pacing and content. Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia all push back against this trend, arguing that developmentally-appropriate learning looks different from school as we typically imagine it.

A Quick Orientation to Each Model

Montessori: “Help me do it myself.”

Grounded in the work of Dr. Maria Montessori, this model emphasizes independence, freedom within limits, and the idea that children learn best through self-directed, sensory-rich exploration.

Hallmarks:

• Carefully prepared shelves of hands-on, manipulative materials sequenced from simple to complex

• Long, uninterrupted “work” periods

• Mixed-age classrooms (often spanning 3-year cycles)

• A calm, orderly environment where children choose their activities

Parent lens: Great for children who thrive with clear structures, predictable routines, and opportunities to build autonomy.

Educator lens: The teacher acts as an observer and guide, introducing materials individually rather than leading whole-class lessons.

Waldorf: “Wonder first, academics later.”

Founded by Rudolf Steiner, Waldorf education prioritizes imagination, rhythm, and connection to nature. It delays formal academics, centering instead on storytelling, creativity, and practical skills through daily activities like baking, gardening, and craft work.

Hallmarks:

• Strong emphasis on play, art, and the natural world

• Daily and seasonal rhythms (songs, verses, rituals)

• Use of simple, natural materials

• Teachers often stay with the same class for multiple years (in elementary grades)

Parent lens: A good fit for families wanting slower-paced, screen-free, nature-aligned early childhood experiences.

Educator lens: Teachers serve as warm, consistent guides who model creativity, care, and reverence for childhood.

Reggio Emilia: “The child has a hundred languages.”

Originating in post-WWII Italy, Reggio is less a fixed curriculum and more a philosophy of collaborative, project-based learning built around children’s interests.

Hallmarks:

• Emergent curriculum based on observation and inquiry

• Documentation (photos, transcripts, portfolios) used to make learning visible

• Strong emphasis on community, relationships, and the environment as “the third teacher”

• Open-ended materials and expressive media

Parent lens: Ideal for families who value creativity, collaboration, and following the child’s natural curiosities.

Educator lens: Teachers work in partnership with children and families to co-construct knowledge, document learning, and treat classrooms as living laboratories.

Key Similarities Across Montessori, Waldorf, and Reggio Emilia

Even with different origins and practices, these three approaches overlap in meaningful ways:

1. Respect for the child

All three prioritize viewing children as capable, curious, and intrinsically motivated learners.

2. Prepared, intentional environments

Each approach treats the environment as a core part of the pedagogy—whether through Montessori’s highly structured materials, Waldorf’s warm natural spaces, or Reggio’s aesthetic provocations.

3. Emphasis on relationships

Montessori emphasizes respectful guidance; Waldorf emphasizes nurturing rhythms; Reggio emphasizes community collaboration. All three highlight relational trust as a foundation of learning.

4. A holistic view of development

They attend to social-emotional, sensory, and creative domains alongside cognition, pushing back against early academic pressure.

Where They Meaningfully Differ

Montessori vs. Waldorf

• Montessori is structured, precise, and rooted in sensory learning; Waldorf is imaginative, artistic, and guided by rhythm and storytelling.

• Montessori materials are specific and sequenced; Waldorf favors open-ended natural materials.

• Montessori introduces literacy and numeracy earlier; Waldorf intentionally delays formal academics.

Montessori vs. Reggio Emilia

• Montessori environments emphasize individual work and mastery; Reggio emphasizes collaboration and group inquiry.

• Montessori materials are fixed and designed for specific learning outcomes; Reggio environments are fluid and shaped by ongoing projects.

• Montessori teachers guide from the side; Reggio educators co-construct with children.

Waldorf vs. Reggio Emilia

• Waldorf leans toward predictability and rhythm; Reggio toward emergent, flexible exploration.

• Waldorf often avoids modern media; Reggio may incorporate technology thoughtfully as a language of expression.

• Waldorf centers fantasy and imagination; Reggio centers real-world inquiry.

So What Does This Mean for Families and Educators?

If you’re a caregiver or parent navigating schooling choices like me, understanding these philosophies can help you refine what matters most for your child:

• Do they crave structure? Montessori might be grounding.

• Do they flourish with creativity and rhythm? Waldorf may align.

• Do they come alive through collaboration and curiosity? Reggio could be the fit.

For educators, exploring these models can spark reflection: Which elements could you meaningfully integrate, even within traditional settings? Think: choice, project work, nature-based play, mixed-age collaboration, etc.

Ultimately, the goal may not be to pick a “best” model, but to recognize that children thrive when environments honor their developmental rhythms, relationships, and innate capacities. Each of these approaches offers a lens for doing just that.

We haven’t quite figured out what school will look like for our family next fall, but it feels fitting that as I return to writing after a hiatus, I’m revisiting what high-quality early childhood education can look like. Whether you’re teaching, parenting, or both, I hope this comparison gives you clarity and inspiration as you navigate your own choices.

***

Join the conversation! Use the comments below or join us over on Instagram to share your own perspectives and experiences.